www.ski-injury.com
![]() 'Snow fun if you're injured....
|
|
General topics -
Specific Sports -
Specific Injuries - Injury Prevention -
Injury Statistics -
Links - FAQ's
- Dr Mike Langran |
|
HOME ۰ CONTACT ۰ SEARCH ۰ DISCLAIMER |
|
Last update 21.3.08 This site is best viewed at a minimum resolution of 1024x768 |
|
|
|
|
Thank the stars for snowboarding!
This sport came along just at the right time to completely re-invigorate ski
slopes world-side. From fairly humble beginnings as Sherman Popper's 'snurfer'
in the 1960's the sport finally took off and enjoyed a phenomenal rise in popularity in the 1990's when
for many years it was undoubtedly the fastest growing winter sport. It has
been responsible for opening up the piste to a wider spectrum of
the population which can only be good for the future of ski areas.
Initially, the sport was viewed with great suspicion and even alarm by some - as
such it gained an unfair image as a
dangerous and reckless sport, pursued only by the young and foolish.
Snowboarders, for their part, felt that skiers were unwilling to share the
slopes with them and complained about the negative attitudes of some
skiers. Globally, some ski areas reacted by banning snowboarding from their slopes
and sadly, even now a few resorts still do. I wouldn't pretend that all the
problems have been resolved between skiers and boarders but thankfully, most
ski areas have now adopted
a positive stance towards snowboarding and skiers have learnt to share the
slopes with boarders. Indeed, its now the skiers wanting to get in on
snowboarder territory! The majority of ski areas have developed specific snowboard parks with half
pipes, rails, kickers etc. created to allow boarders the freedom to practice their
aerobatic manoeuvres without coming into direct conflict with skiers. The
indications are that boarder numbers have begun to plateau out since about 1999.
In most ski areas snowboarders account for about 25-33% of all
users although there are now many areas where snowboarders are in the
majority. For a while, skiboarding (snowblading) overtook snowboarding as the fastest growing
sport on the slopes but this trend seems to have flattened off in the last
couple of years. One thing is for sure, against the predictions of many,
snowboarding is here to stay and I for one am very glad of that.
Injury
rates
Current
injury rate in Scotland - 3.55 injuries per 1000 boarder days (281 MDBI)
Explain what this means
In terms of injury rates, most
ski physicians agree that boarding carries a slightly higher risk of injury
than alpine skiing - between 3-4 injuries per thousand boarder days (as
compared to 2-3 per thousand days for alpine skiing injuries). Remember though
- this rate is
still very low - at worst 0.4%! Another way
of looking at injury risk to calculate the mean days between injury - this is
the total number of snowboarder days in a season divided by the number of
injuries seen. The higher the value, the less likely an injury is to occur.
Overall, there are about 250 MDBI for all snowboarding injuries. This means that an
individual snowboarder is likely to injure some area of the body every 250
days they spend snowboarding. Given that the average boarder does about 12
days per season, this means an injury on average once every 19 years!! The
risk varies with experience as well - the highest risk group being beginner
snowboarders (especially those on their very first day). The risk becomes
lower for those with between 4 and 8 weeks experience but then climbs again
amongst experienced boarders - presumably because they are boarding faster,
attempting jumps and tricks etc.
The commonest injury is to the wrist, with such an injury occurring once every
1135 days, compared to a lower limb injury once every 3000 days - so you can
see that the risk of an upper limb injury is about three times that of a lower
limb injury on a snowboard. Interestingly, those with the highest risk of
injury overall are teenage snowboarders - there is a wrist injury once every 499 days amongst this age group. The
typical profile of an injured boarder is a young male from a non-skiing
background who has had no professional instruction. Snowboarding has a
completely different pattern of injury to skiing - upper limb injuries
predominate, followed by head injuries and lower limb (mainly ankle) injuries.
We will look at each of these in turn. You will also find more information on
our web page that deals with injury
prevention.
Of concern is the fact that injured snowboarders
are twice as likely (34% vs 17%) to sustain a fracture compared to skiers.
Most of these involve the wrist.
There are obvious differences between boarders and skiers that may go some way
to explaining the differing injury rates. Firstly, most injured boarders generally fall
into one of three camps
Skiers looking for a new challenge
Young kids keen to try the trendiest sport
Teenagers and young adults with little or no previous experience of the mountain environment
|
The majority of boarders pick up their own boarding technique gradually without ever seeking professional instruction. Unlike skiing, its not that difficult (though it is tiring!) to hire a board and begin to put together some turns without proper lessons. However, one of the first things a novice snowboarder must learn is the ability to maintain a stable stance – not easy, with both feet fixed in non-release bindings to a relatively narrow board. When balance is lost, snowboarders (unlike skiers) cannot ‘step out’ a leg in order to recover, as both feet are firmly attached to the board. The instinctive protective reaction in the event of a snowboard fall is to outstretch a hand to break the landing, thus placing the upper limb at risk of injury. This is one of the main reasons why beginner boarders are at higher risk of injury. Our research in Scotland indicates that many snowboarders also learn from friends. This can be a risky road to take as professional instruction (coupled with accrued experience) reduces your risk of injury. Interestingly, we have also found though that snowboarders who have lessons but who have little experience on a snowboard are more likely to be injured - probably because they push their limits too far too quickly. Proper instruction should also help prevent the development of bad habits which can be hard to eradicate later on, unfortunately restricting your progress in the sport. Finally, many snowboarders do not come from skiing families and therefore may not be aware of the sometimes considerable risks the mountain environment can present, although this is beginning to change now, as older boarders breed baby boarders! These risks are especially so off-piste and has been illustrated time and time again by numerous deaths and serious accidents, often involving avalanches - if you are venturing off piste, make sure you know what you are doing (or have a guide with you who does), don't go alone (even venturing a few seemingly innocent metres off the side of a tree-lined piste can be dangerous as the documentation of tree well deaths (NARSIDS) has shown), carry the right equipment and check the avalanche forecast for the area! If you plan to go off piste in a foreign then check the wording of your insurance policy carefully (what d'ya mean, "what insurance policy...."??!!!) as many exclude off-piste activities and require you to be with a professional guide or instructor for cover to be valid. You're looking at a hefty bill if you do get injured or need assistance and you're not covered...(unless you're in Scotland, of course!) Nevertheless, keep the bigger
picture in mind and never lose sight of the fact that snowboarding is an
exciting, challenging snow sport with moves that are the envy of many skiers
and which still has an injury risk of less than 1%.
|
These usually occur as a
result of two main mechanisms - either a fall onto an outstretched hand or a
direct traumatic blow to an area of the arm/shoulder. The former leads to the
large number of wrist and shoulder injuries seen yearly - an estimated 95,000
snowboard wrist fractures world-wide per season! Beginners are particularly at
risk as I've already stated as they try to learn a stable stance on their
snowboard. Unlike skiers, who can step out a leg when they lose balance,
snowboarders are more likely to topple over and the natural tendency is to fall
onto an out stretched hand
(hence the term 'FOOSH' used in the Emergency Department to describe this
mechanism). These wrist fractures are often not simple injuries and can lead
to long term disability and early development of osteo-arthritis, especially
when the break goes through the joint line. One simple technique that may protect your
upper limb in the event of a fall is to learn to fall correctly - this
technique is described and illustrated
here.
Highly recommended, is the
purchase of wrist protection - either as a standalone pair of wrist guards or
as an integrated glove/guard system. There is now overwhelming evidence to
support their effectiveness in reducing the incidence of wrist injuries.
Effective wrist guard protection is now easily available online - I would urge
all snowboarders to read my page on wrist injuries
and seriously consider buying a pair of recommended guards. Its money really well spent IMHO.
It always surprises me
that snowboarders are prepared to spend up to £100 yet won't spend £35
or so on wrist guards. Potentially serious head injuries are pretty rare
whereas wrist injuries are the number one snowboard injury and guards have been shown to be effective
in reducing the risk of them occurring. Most head injuries are minor in
nature, but wrist injuries are far more likely to lead to disability and
ultimately prevent someone
snowboarding often until the next season. Ask any ski area doctor given a
choice what the one piece of protective
kit a snowboarder should buy is and the answer will likely be... wrist guards!
At the end of the day, of course, the absolute risk is pretty low - but I really hate seeing someone injured, in pain and unable to snowboard. For a meagre £35 or so, do you really want to risk being unable to snowboard again for a long time?....I'd be a wealthy man if I had £1 for every time a snowboarder who had just broken their wrist said to me in the ski patrol room or health centre "...if only I'd been wearing wrist guards". I'd be even wealthier if i had £1 for every boarder (usually beginners) who tell me they have never heard of wrist guards. Don't let that person be you!
As I've already stated, you'll find much more
information on my wrist injuries page - click here.
The other
area of the upper limb that is injured quite commonly is the shoulder joint.
This is either due to force being transmitted up the arm from a fall onto an
outstretched hand or direct trauma from a fall onto the outside of the
shoulder itself. Falls can lead to fractures of the upper
arm (humerus) or collar-bone (clavicle), damage to the shoulder joint itself
(such as a dislocation) or to the joint between the collar-bone and the
shoulder blade (the so-called AC joint). See the photo on the right for a
classic example of a "sprung" AC joint. Learning to fall correctly is once
again a simple way to try and reduce the
chances of a shoulder injury - click
here for details..
There are a variety of shoulder pads and protectors on the market - whilst
there is no direct evidence to prove that they reduce the
risks of injury, they are not going to do any harm and are worth considering,
especially if you have injured your shoulder before. For more detailed
information on shoulder injuries - visit my specific page by
clicking here.
Finally, the other upper limb injury we see in snowboarders is acute dislocations of the elbow joint. This is a nasty injury, as there is often associated damage to the nerves and blood vessels around the elbow joint. The injury occurs as the result of forced hyperextension of the elbow (i.e. you land on a straight arm that gets bent back even further by the force of the fall). Not a nice injury.
Lower limb injuries can be
divided into those affecting the femur (thigh bone), tibia and fibula (shin
bones), the knee and those affecting the ankle. The first two groups of injury
are usually the result of direct trauma either with a static object or another
boarder/skier. Trees and another person are the commonest things to collide
with. Collisions with trees in particular can be associated with some serious
trauma and kissing a tree at 25mph+ is definitely to be avoided. Most of these
direct impact injuries to the lower leg affect the lead (front) leg and they can range from a
simple bruise up
to a nasty fracture.
The risk of sustaining an ankle injury as a snowboarder is related to the kind
of boot worn. These are broadly divided into hard and soft shell boots. Hard
shell boots tend to worn by more experienced boarders and (as with ski boots)
tend to protect the ankle joint. Soft boots are favoured by beginners as they
allow some degree of ankle movement which helps the rider to manoeuvre the
board. Unfortunately they do not offer the ankle as much in the way of
protection. Any forces transmitted back from the board tend to be absorbed by
this joint. This is especially so when the ankle is either compressed or
turned in (as can happen after a jump).
Increasingly popular are the relatively new hybrid snowboard boots. These
boots are constructed either:-
a) With soft leather or synthetic outer shell and a stiff inner boot or
b) By combining a hard shell base with a softer upper component. The idea is
to combine the comfort and manoeuvring ability of a soft boot with the
stability and protection of a hard boot.
So-called "Moon" boots or hiking boots lack the degree of support
required for boarding and should not be used for this sport.
Snowboard binding systems, unlike alpine ski systems, are non-releasable.
Essentially, there are four main varieties –
|
Knee injuries Knee injuries are less common and less serious in snowboarders than
skiers for several reasons:- |
The ankle joint is
composed of the distal end of the tibia (shin) bone, fibula bone (on the
outside of the lower leg) and the talus bone. The talus bone and the tibia
bone form a joint called the tibio-talar joint. This joint allows your ankle
to move bakwards and forwards (flex/extend in medical language). The lateral
process of the talus bone articulates with both the fibula and the os calcis
(part of the heel bone - the calcaneum), thereby forming the lateral part of
the subtalar joint.If these fractures are missed (especially
types II and III) then the consequences can be quite severe for what seems
like an innocuous injury - the fracture may fail to re-unite and heal
properly and this can lead to early development of osteoarthritis in the
ankle joint with resulting pain, loss of function and disability.
Diagnosis
Unfortunately, this area of the ankle often does not show that clearly on a
normal ankle x-ray and so not only have most doctors outwith ski areas not
have heard of it, but they'll look at the x-ray and think it looks normal.
To diagnose a FLPT usually requires a CT scan, and it can be difficult to
convince a doctor of the need for this if they think the x-ray looks normal!
As so often in medicine, we should treat the patient, not the x-ray. In the
situation of a snowboarder who has had a heavy fall/landing and injured
their ankle as a result, we should all have a high index of suspicion for
this injury. If the x-ray looks normal, and a simple ankle sprain is
suspected, then you would normally expect this to improve fairly rapidly
with standard treatment, and certainly it should be possible to bear weight
on the ankle after 7 days. If its not, and/or the ankle remains very
painful, then the injured snowboarder needs to go back and get their ankle
re-assessed. IF NECESSARY, COPY AND PRINT OUT THIS INFORMATION AND TAKE IT
WITH YOU - ASK THE DOCTOR TO LOOK AT THIS WEB PAGE AND/OR DO A GOOGLE
SEARCH. This is an important injury that can have bad consequences if it is
missed - be persistent!!
Head injuries are usually the
consequence of a fall. Beginners in particular tend to fall backwards and hit
their occiput (the back of the head) on the snow as a result. Most head
injuries are thankfully minor in nature. However, with increasing force of
impact the risks increase and can include death or long term disability. A two
year study from Nagano (remember the 1998 Winter Olympics?) reported on 143
boarders with head injuries. Nine were serious in nature - three required
brain surgery and three were left with long term brain damage. None of the
injured boarders (or the 158 skiers with head injuries also seen) were wearing
head protection.....
There seems little doubt that wearing a helmet makes sense. They are, however,
still viewed as un-cool and not trendy. But what's cool about brain damage?!
If you are buying a helmet try and get one that meets one of the US standards
(Snell RS 98 or ASTM 2040) or the European standard EN1077). Snell is the most
stringent standard and consequently (and unfortunately) very few helmets meet
it. Look inside the
helmet and check the label. Helmets that meet these standards have at least
undergone formal testing - there are many "helmets" being sold that
meet no standards whatsoever. The crucial thing about a helmet is that it does
not make you invincible!! There is no evidence that wearing a helmet will
protect you from death or serious injury if, for example, you collide with a
static object (such as a tree) at or above the speed of a normal intermediate
skier or boarder (40-60 km/h). Unfortunately, those who have found this out
don't live to pass the message on. If you do the maths (and some have), the
forces involved with such a collision are way beyond the capacity of all
modern helmets. They are certainly likely to be of benefit in more minor
impacts, glancing blows and the like. Kids are statistically more likely to
sustain a head injury and therefore the argument for kids wearing helmets is
stronger still. For more info on helmets check out my page on the
subject - click here. There are also some interesting
sites listed on my link page. At the end of the day
the absolute individual risk of a head injury (let alone a serious one) is
quite small - less than 1% in fact. It is for this reason that respected
bodies such as the International Society for Skiing Safety and the American
Medical Association have agreed that there is no evidence to back a call for
mandatory helmets for everyone. But if its your head that gets mashed that
figure means nothing....like so many things in life I guess - up to you at the
end of the day.
|
Spinal injuries are
relatively rare but devastating when they happen. They usually occur
in one of two ways - There are now two pages
on this website devoted to spinal injuries in detail. Click here. 1. Eight non-avalanche (related) snow-immersion deaths (NARSIDs) - click here 2. How to stay alive in deep powder snow - click here For the complete picture
on what a snowboarder can do to prevent injury see our separate web
page devoted to injury prevention. |
Injuries in snow parks
The country with undoubtedly the largest snow sports injury database in the world is
France, a country with nearly 9 million skier/boarder visits per year. The
Medicins de Montagne (MdeM) group have collated an
impressive database of over 435,000 injuries. At the ISSS 2007 conference MdeM presented the
first data I am aware of looking specifically at accidents occurring in snow parks. They
found that 2.8% of all winter sports accidents in France occur in a snow park.
64.6% of these injuries occur amongst snowboarders - this equates to 7% of all
injuries seen from snowboarding. Looking specifically at snowboarders injured
in parks, their key findings comparing snowboarders
injured in snow parks to all other injured snowboarders were:
Snow park injuries were more likely to be severe in nature
- Rates of joint dislocations were higher as were rates of injury to the
head, spine and chest
Snow park injuries were less likely to affect the wrist joint (normally the number one injury area amongst boarders)
ACL injuries (a relatively rare injury to snowboarders outside a park) were more frequent in snow parks
More boarders injured in snow parks required admission to hospital
Interestingly, no design standards exist for snowboard jumps - anyone can (and does) just build a ramp that looks about right, and then let the boarders get on with it. Unfortunately, recent litigation cases involving boarders who have sustained serious injuries after jumps went wrong have brought the issue sharply into focus. The challenge is to design jumps that are safe, and yet not boring. Snowboarders (and skiers for that matter) love to jump for many reasons - the challenge and exhilaration involved are but two of these. Take them away though, and all the fun goes out of jumping. So it seems clear that the design engineers, snowboarders and perhaps even the lawyers need to sit down to bash things out. Just remember for now that when you take off from that jump or ramp that chances are high that the person who built it probably has no idea how or where you are likely to land and at what speed or impact angle......
|
Although many good forums exist on the web for snowboarders, I strongly recommend the guys and gals on Adrenalin trip.... Click here for Adrenalin trip For those of you in Japan, SnowJapan is also an excellent forum - click here Snowboarding terms, language and slang Everything about snowboard stances Useful information on all aspects of snowboarding gear
|
|
|
© Copyright Dr Mike Langran 1999-2008 This website is registered under International Copyright Law. All international rights reserved. No part of this web page may be reproduced in any form, or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, without permission in writing from Dr Langran.
|